Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hurt v. Claims Administrator
as 1:2017cv06102
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
Claims Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
as 1:2009md02027
In Re:
IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
Lead Plaintiff:
The Global Institutional Investor, Sampension KP Livsforsikring A/S, SKAGEN AS and others
Plaintiff:
Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc., Trustee for Aberdeen Claims Trust and Aberdeen Claims Trust II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Wayne Lau, Aekta Ben Patel, Hossein Momenzadeh and others
Petitioner:
Priyanka Arora, Integre Advisors, Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada and others
Defendant:
Maytas Infra Limited, Maytas Properties, Byrraju Teja Raju and others
Consolidated Defendant:
B. Rama Raju, B. Ramalinga Raju, Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2015cv09053
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, CRST Inc, Midland Claim Administrators Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2015cv02196
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc. v. Saytam Computer Services Limited et al
as 1:2010cv02877
Plaintiff:
Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc.
Defendant:
Saytam Computer Services Limited , B. Ramalinga Raju, B. Rama Raju and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
