Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clarence Bogan, III v. Rhonda Gibson, et al
as 19-4221
Respondent:
JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, DAVID YOST, Attorney General, STATE OF OHIO and others
Respondent / Appellee:
CLIFFORD PINKNEY, Cuyahoga County Sheriff and RHONDA GIBSON, Warden of Cuyahoga County Jail
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE BOGAN, III
Bogan v. State of Ohio, et al.
as 1:2019cv00812
Respondent:
Clifford Pinkney, Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold, David Yost and others
Petitioner:
Clarence Bogan, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bogan v. Saffold et al
as 1:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Shirley S. Saffold, Daniel A. Cleary and Kelly N. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Morgan
as 1:2010cv02491
Petitioner:
Clarence Bogan, III
Respondent:
Donnie Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bogan v. McFaul et al
as 1:2009cv02168
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Gerald T. McFaul, Chuck McIntire, Thomas Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogan v. Schuler
as 1:2009cv01922
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Mary E. Schuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Bogan, III v. Kevin McDonough, et al
as 08-4595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE BOGAN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KOSKO, KEVIN MCDONOUGH, MICHAEL SCHAFER and others
Bogan v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv02073
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith, Mr. Marsh and Mr. Emerson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bogan v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv01811
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith, Mr. Emerson and Mr. Marsh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bogan v. McDonough et al
as 1:2008cv01727
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Kevin McDonough, Michael Schafer, Ronald L. Shobert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
