Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Haggart v. US
as 21-1072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBLOIS PROPERTIES, LLC, c/o David and Debra Deblois, FREDERICK P. MILLER, PBI ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART and KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1073
Plaintiff:
KELLY J. SATHER, PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY and GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
GUSTAFSON et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
DAVID GUSTAFSON , ROBERT N. ARMEN, JR. , LEWIS R. CARLUZZO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
HUERTA et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00854
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA HUERTA and ELEAZAR HUERTA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
HURTADO VARGAS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA ASTRID HURTADO VARGAS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
KNIGHT V HHS
as 10-5163
Petitioner-Appellee:
Amanda Knight, Claudia J. Rotoli-Barr, Amanda Knight and others
Respondent-Appellant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
MARRIN V GRIFFIN
as 09-1031
Defendant-Appellant:
Claudia Griffin and Jeffrey Griffin
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Etch-It, Inc. and Michael Marrin
Defendant-Appellee:
Heidi Marrin
BRATHWAITE V OPM
as 06-3197
Petitioner:
Claudia Brathwaite
Respondent:
Office of Personnel Management
BULL V US
as 06-5038
Plaintiff-Appellee:
CLAUDIA MONISTROL, DAVID BAILEY, ED KRUZEL and others
CLAUDIA MONISTROL:
, and
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION and NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
