Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Thomas v. Kurtzberg et al
as 1:2011cv05890
Plaintiff: Roger Moore Thomas
Defendant: Joel Laurence Kurtzberg, Esq., Sonia Metellus, Esq., Jeffrey L. Emdin, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pryor et al v. Pollard et al
as 1:2011cv02948
Defendant: Lloyd Blanchard, Claudia Colbert, Reynard Doyley and others
Plaintiff: Edwin Ellis, Chino Hardin, Divine Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wooten v. St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital Center et al
as 1:2011cv04332
Plaintiff: James R. Wooten
Defendant: St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital Center, Louis Schenkel, Norman Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcazar v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00987
Plaintiff: Claudia Balcazar
Defendant: City of New York and P.O.s John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Llewellyn v. Rockland State Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 7:2010cv08091
Plaintiff: George S Llewellyn
Defendant: Rockland State Psychiatric Hospital, James Bopp, Edward Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Ridley v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
as 1:2009cv07852
Plaintiff: Claudia Ridley and Claudia Ridley
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Lewis v. Chun et al
as 1:2008cv00087
Plaintiff: Claudia Rudin Lewis
Defendant: Alexander Chun and Lenox Hill Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ehrlich et al v. The Incorporated Village of Sea Cliff et al
as 2:2007cv05316
Plaintiff: Robert Ehrlich, 100 Roslyn Avenue, LLC and Sea Cliff Coffee Company, Inc.
Defendant: The Incorporated Village of Sea Cliff, The Incorporated Village of Sea Cliff, Eileen Krieb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?