Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Briand Williams et al v. Leroy D Baca et al
as 2:2011cv08232
Respondent:
Leroy D Baca, Robert Bob Brooks, Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr and others
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Briand Williams
Clifford Brent Thomas v. James A Yates
as 2:2011cv07643
Petitioner:
Clifford Brent Thomas
Respondent:
James A. Yates
Curtis Clifford Ingram v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County
as 2:2011cv03987
Petitioner:
Curtis Clifford Ingram
Respondent:
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Clifford Brigham v. Linda Sanders
as 2:2009cv05537
Petitioner:
Clifford Brigham
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Clifford Ray Garrett v. Domingo Uribe
as 5:2009cv00984
Petitioner:
Clifford Ray Garrett
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Dixon III v. Ken Clark
as 5:2009cv00755
Petitioner:
Clifford Dixon, III
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Clifford Laine v. James A Yates
as 8:2008cv01367
Petitioner:
Gary Clifford Laine
Respondent:
James A Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Eugene Givens v. D. K. Sisto
as 2:2008cv07314
Petitioner:
Clifford Eugene Givens
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Clifford George v. Woodring
as 2:2008cv06632
Petitioner:
John Clifford George
Respondent:
Woodring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clifford Brent Thomas v. James A Yates
as 2:2007cv03073
Petitioner:
Clifford Brent Thomas
Respondent:
James A Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
