Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Botheroyd v. Metra Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02823
Plaintiff:
Clifford Botheroyd
Defendant:
Metra Police Department, Luis Rodriguez and Jose Monterrubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rogers v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Clifford Martin, Gerald Jones, Kameisha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Clifford Roberts
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Vargas v. Brambila et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mr Jesus Vargas
Defendant:
Emanuel Brambila, Village of Stone Park, The, Ricardo Sarabia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of Danville et al
as 2:2021cv02194
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wilson
Defendant:
City of Danville, Clifford Hegg, T.J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby v. Etcheson et al
as 3:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Clifford Samuel Kirby and Clifford S. Kirby, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Jake Etcheson, St. Elmo Police Department and Sperry's Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
