Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Edwards v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Clifford Edwards
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waller v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Clifford O Waller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ceasar v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ceasar
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burnham v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01987
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Clifford Burnham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
Clifford Henderson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eralus v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv01175
Plaintiff:
Clifford Eralus
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01025
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clifford Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levinsky v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05120
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clifford Levinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Home-Owners Insurance Company et al v. Sims et al
as 3:2020cv01850
Defendant:
Taurean J. Sims, Midwest Construction Services, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co.,L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
P&P Transportation Services, Inc. and Home-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baskin v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03448
Defendant:
Davol Incorporated and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Baskin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
