Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Gooden v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Gooden, III v. Scott County Prosecutors, et al
as 23-2378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott County Prosecutors, Robert Lee Cusack, Meghan Corbin, Judge and others
Clifford Gooden, III v. Brian Heyer, et al
as 23-2385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian E. Heyer, Attorney and Tim Lane, Sheriff
Clifford Gooden, III v. Meghan Corbin, et al
as 23-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Meghan Corbin, Judge, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Scott County Prosecutor, Chris Widmer, Prosecutor and others
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Gooden v. Lane
as 4:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent:
Tim Lane
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooden v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States and Ku Klux Klan Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Heyer et al
as 4:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Brian Heyer and Tim Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Scott County Prosecutors et al
as 4:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Scott County Prosecutors, Robert Lee Cusack, Meghan Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Corbin et al
as 4:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Meghan Corbin, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Chris Widmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
