Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ascentium Capital LLC v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv04612
Defendant:
Marshall Lebarron Green Individually and also known as Matthew Clower also known as Peter Carroll also known as Michael P. Carroll doing business as Carroll Management Group, LLC, Temarque Brown, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Ascentium Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lechter et al v. Aprio, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Aprio, LLP, James Jowers, Robert Greenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Dalba, Kathryn Dalba, Sylvia Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLOWERS v. UNITED AUTO CREDIT CORPORATION
as 7:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA CLOWERS
Defendant:
UNITED AUTO CREDIT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund et al v. Landers Enterprises, LLC
as 3:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund, IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund, IBEW Local 613 Family Health Fund and others
Defendant:
Landers Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Other Statutes
IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund et al v. Broadwater Controls, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02492
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund, IBEW Local 613 Defined Contribution Pension Fund, IBEW Local 613 Family Health Fund and others
Defendant:
Broadwater Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Other Statutes
Clowers v. Oubre
as 1:2009cv02449
Petitioner:
Keyvean Shaheed Clowers
Respondent:
Sheila Oubre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
