Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Charlie Latham v. Tom Vilsack
as 11-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charlie Edward Latham
Plaintiff - Appellee:
All Plaintiffs, Irene Ainsworth, Huey Allison and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Vilsack, Secretary
Clyde Rattler v. Secretary of Health and Human
as 11-5238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde Lacy Rattler
Defendant - Appellee:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
RATTLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011cv00729
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LACY RATTLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RATTLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LACY RATTLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL et al v. CLYDE'S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01720
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY BELL , OLIVIA CARTER and ANTHONY PARKER
Defendant:
CLYDE'S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., CLYDE, INC., CLYDE'S OF GALLERY PLACE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
BARRINGER et al v. U.S. ONE TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
EARL STERLING BARRINGER , MARK BEAUFORD , CALVIN DOE and others
Defendant:
U.S. ONE TRANSPORTATION, MODUPE AYODEJI ATANDA-OWO, GANIYU ATANDO-OWO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clyde Rattler v. Secretary , HHS
as 10-5312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde Lacy Rattler
Defendant - Appellee:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Clyde Rattler v. Department of Labor
as 10-5315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde Lacy Rattler
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Labor, Office of Worker Comp Programs
RATTLER v. US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
as 1:2010cv01562
Plaintiff:
CLYDE L. RATTLER
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RATTLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010cv01484
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LACY RATTLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
