Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lancaster v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Clyde Lancaster, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv02327
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Clyde Lancaster, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. United State of America
as 8:2020cv02280
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Beasley, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Glenn Clyde Beasley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thompson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2015cv00345
Petitioner:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hayes v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2013cv00461
Petitioner:
Clyde A. Hayes
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00648
Petitioner:
William Clyde Barnes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Mason, et al
as 3:2011cv01236
Plaintiff:
BERNARD CLYDE MCGEE
Defendant:
SAMUEL E MASON and LARRY D CANNADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
