Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bess et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bess
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Jr Ernest J Codilis, Jason Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gajewski et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv09230
Plaintiff:
Jozef Gajewski, Wieslawa Gajewski and Robert R. Gajewski
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Codilis and Associates, P.C. and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peel et al v. 1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02404
Plaintiff:
Denise Peel and Tres Peel
Defendant:
1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC, Freddie Mac, Depositor (N/A) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peel v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv07679
Plaintiff:
Tres G. Peel
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Earnest J. Codilis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Murphey et al
as 1:2013cv07017
Plaintiff:
Edgar Banks and Patricia Banks
Defendant:
Morgen Murphey , Ernest J. Codilis , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regan v. Ocwen Loan Sericing, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03933
Plaintiff:
James Regan
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Sericing, LLC and Codilis and Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
