Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Neale v. Coloplast Corporation
as 1:2018cv00274
Defendant:
Coloplast Corporation
Plaintiff:
Melanie Neale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spier v. Coloplast Corporation (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00550
Defendant:
Coloplast Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stanley Roger Spier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crowell v. Analytic Biosurgical Solutions et al
as 4:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Crowell
Defendant:
Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Dell v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
Debbie O'Dell
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Cathy L. Alexander
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Kara M. Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morningstar et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wyonne K. Morningstar and Robert Morningstar
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoffner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Penny Shoffner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
