Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Eugene Lavergne, et al v. United States House of Rep, et al
as 19-5028
Defendant / Appellee: Kim Guadagno, Honorable Lt. Governor/Secretary of State, Christopher Porrino, Honorable Acting New Jersey State Attorney General, Karen L. Haas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eugene Martin Lavergne
Plaintiff / Appellee: Allen J. Cannon, Frederick John Lavergne, Scott Neuman and others
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff: EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Type: Civil Rights Voting
SMITH v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv01162
Petitioner: TYE J. SMITH
Respondent: JOHN DAVIS, COLORADO STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CO Wild Horse and Burro Coal., et al v. Kent Walter, et al
as 09-5340
Plaintiff - Appellee: Colorado Wild Horse and Burro Coalition, Inc., American Mustang and Burro Association, Inc., Cloud Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Kent E. Walter, in his official capacity as Field Manager, BLM, Sarah (Sally) E. Wisely, in her official capacity as BLM Colorado State Director, Kenneth Lee Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Interior and others
CYTOLOGIC, INC., et al v. BIOPHERESIS GMBH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00978
Plaintiff: CYTOLOGIC, INC., and COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Defendant: BIOPHERESIS GMBH and BIOPHERESIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?