Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(HC) Allen v. Matteson
as 2:2023cv02706
Petitioner:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Respondent:
G. Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Allen v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Matteson, M. Spencer and R. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Canopy Growth Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05891
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Canopy Growth Corporation, David Klein and Judy Hong
Petitioner:
Donald Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
(PC) Allen v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Matteson, Y. Hill, M. Dernoncourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 18-55718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, CDCR Secretary, M. VOONG, Chief, R. BRIGGS, Appeals Examiner and others
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-56655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, CDCR Secretary, M. VOONG, Chief, R. BRIGGS, Appeals Examiner and others
Allen JR., II v. Beard et al
as 3:2016cv02713
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen JR., II
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, J. Clark Kelso, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen JR., II v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv01923
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen JR., II
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, M. Voong, R. Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Cheung
as 14-16797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEUNG
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Stanislaus County, et al
as 14-16652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
STANISLAUS COUNTY, MARK PUTHUFF, Former Sheriff, ADAM CHRISTIANSON, Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
