Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MOTEN v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al.
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE C. MOTEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RANDY GRIFFIN, COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
GASTONG v. STEWART et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STEWART, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA, BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALONE v. COMMANDER IN CHIEF et al
as 1:2018cv01534
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF TREASURY and COMMANDER IN CHIEF
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
AL-BALUCHI v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv02083
Petitioner:
AMMAR AL-BALUCHI
Respondent:
ROBERT M. GATES, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE, GTMO and COMMANDER, PRISON CAMP, GTMO
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ALI NASHIR et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv01085
Petitioner:
ABDUL RAHIM HUSSEIN MUHAMMED ALI NASHIR and SCOTT L. FENSTERMAKER
Respondent:
ROBERT M. GATES, COMMANDER OF THE JOINT TASK FORCE, GTMO and COMMANDER OF PRISON CAMP, GTMO
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
