Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Toliver v. Sanchez Perri
as 14-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michel Toliver
Defendant:
Fountoulakis, et al, John Does, Jane Does and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, State of New York, SOMU Detective Olmo and others
Robinson v. Kelly
as 14-153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Robinson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Kelly, Commissioner, The New York City Police Department and Michael Bloomberg, Mayor, The City of New York, in their individual capacities
Houston v. New York City Police
as 13-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyrone Houston
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Individually and as a Municipal Agency for New York State, District 33 New York City Police, Individually and as Police Command for the City of New York, M. Toussaint, Shield #30127, Individually and as Police Officer for the City of New York and others
Toliver v. Sanchez Perri
as 11-4719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michel Toliver
Defendant:
Fountoulakis, et al, John Does, Almo Sanchez Perri, S.O.M.U. Detective and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, State of New York, Olmo, S.O.M.U. Detective and others
Gibson v. The City et al
as 1:2007cv04702
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant:
The City, Commissioner of New York City Police Department, Kimberly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salih v. Commissioner of New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv01797
Plaintiff:
Amina Salih
Defendant:
Commissioner of New York City Police Department, Commissioner of New York City Corrections, Deputy Commissioner of New York City Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salih v. Commissioner et al
as 1:2007cv03015
Plaintiff:
Amina Salih
Defendant:
Commissioner, New York City Corrections, Commissioner of New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
