Cases 1 - 10 of 334
De Marino v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00460
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Kristie De Marino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lafferty v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00459
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Kristina Kay Lafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McNeely v. Commissioner of SSA
as 9:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kellie A. McNeely
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lovett v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Lovett
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lane Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fatayri v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Loris Fatayri
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meyers v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00214
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Stanley Keith Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Semper v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Tonya Semper
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2024cv01508
Plaintiff:
Bertha Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whittington v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Lisa Whittington
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
