Cases 21 - 29 of 29
NIEVES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2008cv06206
Plaintiff:
DORIS NIEVES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Jenkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McInnis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv00211
Plaintiff:
James McInnis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
YORK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2008cv00321
Plaintiff:
PAUL S. YORK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEITCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv03863
Plaintiff:
PETER LEITCH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WEED v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv01812
Plaintiff:
DEBRA JOYCE WEED
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
SKORUPSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 3:2007cv01406
Plaintiff:
MARIA SKORUPSKI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv01087
Plaintiff:
TEXEIRA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
VAZQUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv01089
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
