Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Antonio Arriola, et al v. KY, et al
as 19-5036
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CABINET FOR JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY and RODNEY BALLARD, Individually
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRIS E. CROPP, JOHN TILLEY, Individually, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID ALLEN VOYLES, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DONALD ROBERTS, CHRISTOPHER HOPPER and others
Arriola et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arriola , Keath Bramblett , Christopher Hopper and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Justice and Public Safety , Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corre, et al
as 12-6524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, MARSHALL COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT, MARSHALL COUNTY JAIL and others
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corre, et al
as 12-6300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and PULASKI COUNTY JAILER
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corre, et al
as 12-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and PULASKI COUNTY JAILER
Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department et al
as 6:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ridgeway
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department, Pulaski County Jailer, Mike Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department et al
as 3:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ridgeway
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department and Pulaski County Jailer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
