Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY v. USA
as 1:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
USA
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO V US
as 11-5028
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO V US
as 11-5022
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO V US
as 11-5020
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company and Yankee Atomic Electric Company
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY v. USA
as 1:2007cv00875
Plaintiff:
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER V US
as 07-5083
Amicus Curiae:
Alabama Power Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Boston Edison Company and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Nebraska Public Power District
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC:
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
CONNECTICUT ATOMIC V US
as 07-5033
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
CONNECTICUT YANKEE V US
as 07-5027
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
PSEG NUCLEAR V US
as 05-5162
Amicus Curiae:
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE, KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC and PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
WI Elec Power Co v. DOE, et al
as 99-1342
Petitioner:
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy and United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
