Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Menckowski v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tonya Menckowski
Defendant:
Continental Tire North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nevings v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00505
Plaintiff:
David Nevings
Defendant:
Continental Tire North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Napoli v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 3:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Napoli
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft and Continental Tire North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eacret v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00794
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Eacret
Defendant:
Continental Tire North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyle v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Boyle, Edward J. Boyle and Edward J. Boyle
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, ABB Inc, Allied Signal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dunn v. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Continental Automotive, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00298
Plaintiff:
Nick R. Dunn
Defendant:
Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Continental Automotive, Inc. and Certain Affiliated Companies, Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Continental Automotive, Inc. and Certain Affiliated Companies, Continental Tire North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Beasley v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
William L. Beasley and William L. Beasley
Defendant:
Continental Tire North America, Inc. and Pension Plan for Hourly Employees of Continental Automotive, Inc. and Certain Affiliated Companies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
