Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Ransom v. Cook et al
as 9:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ransom
Defendant:
Ms. Cook, Ms. Harrigan, Mr. Rushford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooper v. Cook
as 9:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Jordon Hooper
Respondent:
Amy Cook, St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, St. Lawrence County Supreme Court District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Cook
as 1:2024cv01655
Petitioner:
Robert Brown
Respondent:
Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv09474
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Warden Jane Doe, Warden Harvey, Nurse Medical Director Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moshir v. Chef/Cook et al
as 1:2023cv08786
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Chef/Cook, Sikh Afsc, Any (And) all of the here (in, by (and) through and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Bishop, Locke, Conto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Bell et al
as 9:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
E. Bell, C. Delutis, Marcil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Cook et al
as 9:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ransom
Defendant:
Ms. Cook, Ms. Harrigan, Mr. Rushford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
