Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Leaman v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tony Leaman
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot E Z, Official Number 270361
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Pierce Ford Gilreath-Johnson v. Guardian Angel, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jamie M. Peirce Ford Gilreath-Johnson and Jamie M. Pierce Ford Gilreath-Johnson
Defendant:
Guardian Angel, LLC, Corey Potter and The F/V Guardian Angel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Gilreath-Johnson v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie Gilreath-Johnson
Defendant:
Corey Potter, Kyle Potter, Alaska Tendering Hiring Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Albee v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Justin Albee
Defendant:
Corey Potter, THE F/V KNOT E Z, Official Number 270361 and THE F/V GAMBLER, Official Number __
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Gilreath-Johnson v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Austin Gilreath-Johnson
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot, Official Number 270361, Her Engines, Machinery, Appurtenances and Cargo, in Rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Heckert v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jake Heckert
Defendant:
Corey Potter and THE F/V GAMBLER, OFFICIAL NUMBER ___
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Martinsen v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Marc Martinsen
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot E Z
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
Borman v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
John Borman
Defendant:
Corey Potter, Knot E Z LLC and F/V The Knot E Z
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Gordon v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Gordon
Defendant:
Corey Potter and F/V Gambler
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Borman v. Potter et al
as 2:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
John Borman
Defendant:
Corey Potter, The Knot E Z, LLC, F/V Knot E Z and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
