Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Feliciano v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02661
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Feliciano
Defendant:
Grady Judd, K. McGraw, Don M. Jonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv01352
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Corizon Health Care Services, Centurion Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
John Kersey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SINGER et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICE, W SINGER and L MOYE
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LAMAR ROGERS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coe v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 8:2019cv01338
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Corizon Health Care Services, Polk County Jail (South) and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T. Coe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Douglas, Brandon S. Lowery, D. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services, William Cameron, William Prummell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beck v. Cameron et al
as 2:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
David Alan Beck
Defendant:
William Cameron and Corizon Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beck v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
David Alan Beck
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and William Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beck v. Cameron et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
David Alan Beck
Defendant:
William Cameron and Corizon Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
