Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Lloyd v. Corizon, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv12285
Plaintiff: Richard Lloyd
Defendant: Corizon, Inc.
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 22-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant: TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee: CORIZON, INC. and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE OF MICHIGAN, P.C.
LaPine v. Booth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv12423
Defendant: Lisa West, Carmen McIntyre, Hinijosa and others
Plaintiff: Darrin LaPine
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10944
Defendant: Quality Correctional Care of Michigan, P.C. and Corizon, Inc.
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant: Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant: Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Grahn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10903
Plaintiff: Broderick Hodge
Defendant: Corey Grahn, Randel, Surbine Aiken and others
LaPine v. Corizon Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10750
Plaintiff: Darrin LaPine
Defendant: Corizon Inc., Prison Health Services, MDOC and others
Kensu v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10175
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dan Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thomas Farr v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 17-5482
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS W. FARR
Defendant - Appellee: CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, LLC, CORIZON, INC., DR. CRUMP and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?