Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 22-35876
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Defendant / Appellant:
CORIZON, INC., SCOTT ELIASON, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Defendant:
MURRAY YOUNG and CATHERINE WHINNERY
Anant Tripati v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 18-16446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., Health Care Provider, ADOC, CALVIN JOHNSON, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tennessee, LUCY BURCIAGA, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tucson and others
Melinda Valenzuela v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, JESSICA RAAK, Mental Health Lead at Corizon, CORIZON, INC., Private Contracter at Lewis and others
Faron Lovelace v. Robin Sandy, et al
as 16-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FARON E. LOVELACE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBIN SANDY, DAVID MCCLUSKY, Dr., HOWARD VAN TASSEL and others
Damon Lopez v. Corizon Inc., et al
as 16-35662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON MARCELINO LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON INC., ELIASON, Dr. and SEYS, Ms.
Rickie Storm v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 14-35297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKIE STORM
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, AKA Corizon, Inc, JEFF SHAHAN, FKA Jeff Shaman, MICHAEL TAKAGI, PA and others
Andrew Wolf v. C. Otter, et al
as 13-36016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
C. L. OTTER, (Butch), IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY and others
Michael Sheridan v. Brent Reinke, et al
as 13-35999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHERIDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE, CMS, DBA Corizon, Inc., PHILIP VALDEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
