Cases 11 - 18 of 18
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. COURIER-POST COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00844
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY , TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and WILLIAM J. EINHORN
Defendant:
COURIER-POST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CLAUSO v. SOLOMON et al
as 2:2014cv05280
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES CLAUSO
Defendant:
SOLOMON, JOAN SPADEA, ESQ., FLUHEARTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AFE VICTORY INC. v. ELITE EXPRESS et al
as 1:2013cv06917
Plaintiff:
AFE VICTORY INC.
Defendant:
ELITE EXPRESS , FINSTER COURIER INCORPORATED and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUCAS et al v. ROMITO et al
as 3:2012cv01143
Plaintiff:
JERILYN A. LUCAS and JOHN LUCAS
Defendant:
NICHOLAS H. ROMITO, ROBERT CHEVROLET, INC., UNKNOWN/UNINSURED DRIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WOLOSHIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA WOLOSHIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COURIER CAR RENTAL, PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HWANG v. GRAETER et al
as 2:2011cv01828
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HWANG
Defendant:
MARYANN F. GRAETER , PHOENIX COURIER LTD.. , JOHN I THROUGH JOHN DOE X (Being fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHASHO v. IMPERATORE COURIER SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06497
Plaintiff:
MOURAD SHASHO
Defendant:
IMPERATORE COURIER SYSTEMS, INC., NCD INC., ABC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LENHART et al v. OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv02130
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND R. LENHART, JR. and SUSAN LENHART
Defendant:
OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC. , K. TRUCKING & SON, INC. , RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
