Cases 1 - 10 of 1,340
Ruocco v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11185
Plaintiff:
Dorian Ann Ruocco
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11156
Plaintiff:
Glen Cook
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballis v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11145
Plaintiff:
William Ballis
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robin v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robin
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCarthy v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10942
Plaintiff:
Joseph McCarthy
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2023cv13126
Plaintiff:
Sally Robinson
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DODD v. Covidien Inc.
as 1:2023cv12867
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DODD
Defendant:
Covidien Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joyce v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2023cv12865
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joyce
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lithgow v. Covidien Holding Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12420
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lithgow
Defendant:
Covidien Holding Inc., Covidien, Inc., Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Payne v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12309
Plaintiff:
Joseph Payne
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
