Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Ortega v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv11120
Plaintiff:
Dino A Ortega
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fennessy v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10857
Plaintiff:
Bryan Fennessy
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larsen v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10842
Plaintiff:
Brian D Larsen
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchem v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10837
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mitchem
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nytes v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10834
Plaintiff:
Mark Nytes
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Greco v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10835
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Greco
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shoub v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10836
Plaintiff:
Beth Shoub
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevens v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10771
Plaintiff:
Teddy Stevens
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Weatherspoon v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10776
Plaintiff:
Michael Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillips v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10767
Plaintiff:
Coleman Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
