Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 21-1274
Defendant:
AC1 COMMUNICATIONS, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer, and its principal Adam Cox, MICHAEL ASGHARI, KREATAMOTIVE LLC, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUSSELL LOCKE, THOMAS STARK, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated, STEWART ABRAMSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
Craig Cunningham v. Deborah Lester
as 20-1086
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH S. LESTER, in her individual capacity, JESSICA JOLLIFFE, in her individual capacity and NAOMI JOHNSON, in her individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Craig Cunningham v. General Dynamics Information
as 17-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
Janet Hodgin v. UTC Fire & Security America
as 17-1222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDITH BOWLER, JANET HODGIN, MICHAEL HODGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. HOUGH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KERRY O'SHEA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, GEORGE CAIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORP., INC., ALLIANCE SECURITY, INC., d/b/a AH Security, Inc, formerly doing business as Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc., d/b/a VMS Alarms and others
Defendant:
VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VMS Alarms, d/b/a VMS Alliance Security, d/b/a Alliance Home Protection, LISA HADDAD, d/b/a CCA Services LLC, d/b/a Alarmillinois.com, d/b/a Alarmindiana.com, DOES 1-10 and others
Party-in-Interest:
COMPLIANCEPOINT, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
