Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Anthony Chernetsky v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-16540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY THOMAS CHERNETSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GLENN WHORTON, JACKIE CRAWFORD and others
Michael Williams v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 14-16165
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Mark Pray v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 14-15698
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RONALD PRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tyrone Garner v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 14-15539
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE L. GARNER
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anthony Burriola v. Ted D'Amico, et al
as 13-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. BURRIOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TED D'AMICO, CRAIG FARWELL, UNKOWN FLORES and others
Ansell Jordan v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 12-16975
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANSELL MATRIA JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL, NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cochrane v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00473
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Robert Bannister, Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
-WGC Melvin Chapman VS Craig Farwell, et al.
as 3:2003cv00364
Petitioner:
Melvin Chapman
Respondent:
Craig Farwell, Brian Sandoval and State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
-VPC James Edmondson VS Craig Farwell, et al.
as 3:2004cv00452
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Craig Farwell
Petitioner:
James Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony J. Burriola VS N.D.O.C., et al.
as 3:2004cv00346
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Burriola
Defendant:
unknown Carrete, Jackie Crawford, Ted D'Amico and others
Unknown:
Susan E. Lee, Lilli C. Hitt, Susan E. Lee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
