Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bharatkumar Thakker v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1846
Defendant / Appellant:
WARDEN CRAIG LOWE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BHARATKUMAR GIRISHKUMAR THAKKER, AKA Barry Thakker, AKA Bharathum Thakker, AKA Bharatkum G. Thakker, AKA Bharatkumar G. Thakker
Rodney Boomer v. Harry Lewis, et al
as 13-1246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY BOOMER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LEWIS, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE, DAVID P. CHERUNDOLO, Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Renato Ponta-Garcia v. Craig Lowe, et al
as 11-1807
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS DECKER, Field office Director Immigration & Customs Enforcement, CRAIG LOWE, Warden Pike County Correctional Facility, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENATO MANUEL DACOSTA PONTA-GARCIA
In re: Piotr Znaniecki, et al
as 11-3621
Petitioner:
In re: PIOTR ZNANIECKI
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA, SECRETARY US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, THOMAS DECKER and others
In re: Malkeet Singh, et al
as 11-3200
Petitioner:
In re: MALKEET SINGH
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA, SECRETARY US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, US IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Rodney Boomer v. Chief of US Fed Marshalls, et al
as 11-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY BOOMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF OF US FED MARSHALLS, CRAIG LOWE, GRESSNER and others
Debtor - Appellee:
ROMANCE, Deputy Warden and SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, USP Coleman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Contant v. Lowe, et al
as 11-1869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAN CONTANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG LOWE, WINCOVICH, DERRICK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1807
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
