Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 3:2024cv01790
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. Turner
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Stefan Crayton
Defendant:
. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. Pritzer et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
J B Pritzer, U.S. and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Bob, Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05732
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Crayton
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crayton v. Mitchell
as 4:2023cv04062
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. Allen
as 3:2023cv50100
Plaintiff:
Derrick Crayton
Defendant:
Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Rock Island County et al
as 4:2023cv04005
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Rock Island County, Gerald Bustos, JB Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
