Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Franklin v. Natchez Auto Ventures II, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tamika Franklin
Defendant:
Natchez Auto Ventures II, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
McKeey v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Tammie T. McKeey
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc., UAR Direct, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Banks et al
as 3:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Vonnesha Banks and Vonnastein Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 3:2019cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. McDonald
as 3:2017cv00644
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Anna McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Thames et al
as 3:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Rosemary Thames and Walter White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Vansteenburgh
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Robie Vansteenburgh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Ivory
as 4:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Shavonya Ivory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Ledbetter
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Laura Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
