Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Esparza v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01842
Plaintiff:
Miguel Esparza
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07463
Plaintiff:
Martha Valentine and Ruby Cornejo
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Crocs, Inc. v. Daiso California LLC et al
as 5:2022cv03526
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
Daiso California LLC, Daiso Holding USA, Inc. and Daiso Industries Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Crocs, Inc. v. La Modish Boutique et al
as 2:2021cv05641
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
La Modish Boutique, Legend Footwear, Inc. d/b/a Wild DIva and Legend Footwear, Inc. doing business as Wild Diva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
J.N. et al v. Macy s Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01222
Plaintiff:
J. N. and Diep Nguyen
Defendant:
Macy s Corporate Services, Inc., Does 1-100, Crocs, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.N. et al v. Macy s Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06009
Plaintiff:
Diep Nguyen, Jerry Nguyen and J. N.
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc., Crocs, Inc., Macy's Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crocs, Inc. v. GemCap Lending 1, LLC
as 2:2017mc00006
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
GemCap Lending 1, LLC
Crocs, Inc et al v.Christine Holifield et al
as 2:2014cv04298
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc and Snyder Investment Management LLC
Defendant:
Does, Elite Aviation Holdings II LLC and Christine Holifield
Allon Motzney et al v. Crocs Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00220
Defendant:
Crocs Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
F. M., Allon Motzney and Josephine Motzney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
