Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bell et al v. Weiner et al
as 3:2016cv06879
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Bell, III and Airyn Ruiz Bell
Defendant:
Michael Alan Weiner, Westwood One, Inc. and Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blondell Mitchell v. Tom Joyner, et al
as 15-2831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Joyner, Unknown Tom Joyner Morning Show Co-Hosts, (Individually), Radio One Inc. and others
Blondell Mitchell v. Tom Joyner, et al
as 15-2831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Tom Joyner, Unknown Tom Joyner Morning Show Co-Hosts, (Individually), Radio One Inc. and others
Blondell Mitchell v. Tom Joyner, et al
as 15-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Joyner, Unknown Tom Joyner Morning Show Co-Hosts, (Individually), Radio One Inc. and others
Blondell Mitchell v. KJMC 89.3 F.M., et al
as 13-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
KJMC 89.3 F.M., Tom Joyner, Unknown Tom Joyner Morning Show Co-Hosts and others
Mitchell v. KJMC 89.3 F.M. et al
as 4:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Blondell F. Mitchell
Defendant:
KJMC 89.3 F.M., Tom Joyner, Unknown Tom Joyner Morning Show Co-Hosts and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Blondell Mitchell v. KJMC 89.3 F., et al
as 12-2708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
KJMC 89.3 F., also known as KJMC 89.3, Tom Joyner, Minority Communications, Inc. and others
Mitchell v. KJMC 89.3 et al
as 4:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant:
KJMC 89.3 F., Minority Communications Inc., Reach Media Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haefner v. Cumulus Media Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv04617
Plaintiff:
Scott Haefner
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc., Cumulus Broadcasting Inc. and Scott Springer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
