Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Golston v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Records Manager and others
Petitioner:
Shane A Golston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Ficht v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ficht, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yellowbear v. Norris, et al
as 16-8125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN YELLOWBEAR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SETH NORRIS, Captain, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution, individually and in his official capacity, CURTIS MOFFAT, MICHAEL MCMANIS and others
Yellowbear v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Captain et al
as 2:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Yellowbear, Jr
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Captain, Seth Norris, Curtis Moffat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. WY Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-8033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OWEN MARSHALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC./CORIZON HEALTH, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, individually and inis official capacity and others
Glover v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Glover
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, State of Wyoming, Wyoming Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
