Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. State of Texas et al
as 7:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Wilson
Defendant:
State of Texas, James V Allred Unit, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Wathem et al
as 7:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Johnston
Defendant:
Richard E. Wathem, James D Anders, David R. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrold L Alexander and Marcus S Rhodes
Defendant:
Phyllis McWhorter, Tommy L. Norwood, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Anders et al
as 7:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
James D Anders, Frankie L Haynes and Charles R Horsely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Murray et al
as 7:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Moses, Sr
Defendant:
Leonard S Murray, Lisa S James, Robert B Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Eason et al
as 7:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Robert Eason, Michael Upshaw, Paul Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Wathen et al
as 7:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Richard Wathen, Charles Horsley, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Anders
as 7:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Henry Abram Rodriguez
Defendant:
James D. Anders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
