Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman, et al
as 22-16750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, S. ALFARO, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, G. JAIME, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento and others
(PC) Wheaton v. McComber et al
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Gene Paul Wheaton
Defendant:
J. McComber, D. Baughman, V. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon Hardin v. D. Baughman, et al
as 21-16426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BAUGHMAN, Warden at CSP-Sacramento, B. DENNIS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Sacramento, R. SPARKS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Sacramento and others
(PC) Olvera v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00893
Defendant:
L. C. Hence, P. Perez, D. Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Olvera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01254
Defendant:
C. Bell, L. C. Hence, J. Ceballos and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ruiz v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv00893
Defendant:
D Baughman, J Gallaghar, Ken Clark and others
Plaintiff:
George Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) John v. Hughes et al
as 2:2020cv00984
Defendant:
Z. Hughes, D. Baughman and R. Heise
Plaintiff:
Joseph John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Ybarra et al
as 2:2020cv00102
Defendant:
A. Konrad, D. Baughman, A. Earles and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Conrad et al
as 2:2019cv02551
Defendant:
Tillo, Baker, D. Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
