Cases 1 - 8 of 8
C. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2022cv04762
Plaintiff:
D. C. and Tawana Carter
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education, New York City Board of Education, Jewish Child Care Association of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. et al v. Copiague Union Free School District
as 2:2018cv01908
Plaintiff:
D. C. and Desmond Conley, Sr.
Defendant:
Copiague Union Free School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lin v. Quality Woods, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03043
Plaintiff:
Feng Lin
Defendant:
James Wang, D C Cabinet Factory Inc., Ding Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tehozol et al v. D & C Sutphin Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv05183
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Castro, Fernando Martinez, Edilberto Tehozol and others
Defendant:
D & C Sutphin Corp., Rodolfo Diaz, L & S 5311 Food Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
D.C. et al v. Copiague Union Free School District
as 2:2016cv04546
Plaintiff:
D. C. and Desmond Conley, Sr.
Defendant:
Copiague Union Free School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Conley et al v. Copiague Union Free School District
as 1:2016cv04546
Plaintiff:
D. C. and Desmond Conley
Defendant:
Copiague Union Free School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Zap Cellular, Inc. et al v. Cynammon et al
as 1:2014cv02858
Defendant:
Aaron Cynammon, Rabbi David Cynammon, D C Realty and others
Plaintiff:
E-Z Roamer, LLC. and Zap Cellular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lincoln General Insurance Company v. D & C Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00514
Defendant:
Steven Canterbury, Nancy Colella, D & C Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lincoln General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
