Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ami M. Dennis et al v. Curtresa Washington et al
as 5:2021cv01115
Plaintiff:
Ami M. Dennis and Chris D. Dennis
Defendant:
Curtresa Washington, Jovante Brown and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Robison vs Humboldt Mining Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00583
Defendant:
Robert D. Dennis, Humboldt Mining Company Inc., "Baron" William David Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Robison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Rosas v. Denny et al
as 1:2014cv01418
Plaintiff:
Federico Rosas
Defendant:
D. Denny, M. Seaman and S. Tallerico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanya Dennis v. Wachovia Bank, FSB, et al
as 11-15370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANYA D. DENNIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WACHOVIA BANK, FSB and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Tanya Dennis v. USDC-CAOAK
as 11-70111
:
In re: TANYA D. DENNIS
Petitioner:
TANYA D. DENNIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
WACHOVIA BANK, FSB and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Malik Jones v. J. McGuire, et al
as 10-16706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MCGUIRE, M. DEFOREST, LIPTON and others
Dennis v. Wachovia Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2010cv01596
Plaintiff:
Tanya D. Dennis
Defendant:
Wachovia Bank, FSB and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dennis v. Wachovia Bank, FSB et al
as 4:2010cv01596
Plaintiff:
Tanya D. Dennis
Defendant:
Wachovia Bank, FSB and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Calif Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Johnson
Defendant:
Calif Dept of Corrections, M. D. McDonald, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Jones v. J. McGuire, et al
as 09-16567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MCGUIRE, M. DEFOREST, LIPTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
