Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 18-55777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Michael Todd v. CDCR, et al
as 17-16742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON CORCORAN, D. J. RUIZ and others
Michael Saavedra v. USDC-CAFR
as 14-72411
:
In re: MICHAEL ANTHONY SAAVEDRA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY SAAVEDRA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
SCOTT KERNAN, ANTHONY CHAUS, DOUGLAS MCCLURE and others
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-56024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-56899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Saavedra v. Kernan et al
as 1:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Saavedra
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Anthony Chaus, Douglas McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saavedra v. Kernan et al
as 2:2013cv01499
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Saavedra
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Anthony Chaus, Douglas McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-56102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Michael Todd v. CDCR, et al
as 13-15803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON CORCORAN, D. J. RUIZ and others
Monte Haney v. M. Hernandez, et al
as 12-17567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTE L. HANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. P. HERNANDEZ and D. J. RUIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
