Cases 1 - 10 of 15
D.M. et al v. Lassus Bros. Oil, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
D. M., T. M. and M. M.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lassus Bros. Oil, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Austin Schudel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Karkar et al v. Munoz et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
Hani Karkar and Amal Karkar
Defendant:
Diana Munoz, D&M Beverage LLC, Mousa Husary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. et al v. Shepherd
as 3:2021cv01495
Plaintiff:
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. and First 2 Market Products, LLC
Defendant:
Mary Shepherd doing business as D&M Sales
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wright v. John Doe Employee et al
as 1:2019cv00814
Defendant:
John Doe, D&M Carriers, LLC, d/b/a Freymiller Inc., Freymiller, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargo v. D & M Tours, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01297
Plaintiff:
Walter P. Vargo, Jr.
Defendant:
D & M Tours, Inc., Jose Roman, FedEx, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomas-Pedro et al v. Holden
as 3:2018cv01136
Plaintiff:
Tomas Tomas-Pedro , Manuel Ismael Xol-Mo , Williams Xol-Mo and others
Defendant:
Bryan Holden and Shane M Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Merlak
as 4:2016cv02955
Petitioner:
Damon D. M. Mathis
Respondent:
Steven Merlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniels v. D&M Carriers LLC
as 1:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S Daniels
Defendant:
D&M Carriers LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Franklin et al
as 3:2012cv02622
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jody L. Franklin, P D M F, Inc. and Christine L. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Joe Hand Promotions v. D & M Amen Corner
as 4:2010cv02574
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
D & M Amen Corner, Inc., Ellie Veltri, Donald Fleck and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
