Cases 1 - 10 of 47
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19536
Plaintiff:
COREY D PHILLIPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
Michael D. Phillips
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D PHILLIPS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44948
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D PHILLIPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Eaton et al
as 3:2021cv00648
Defendant:
Larry Young, D. Phillips, G. Kilik and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN v. CLEMMONS
as 3:2021cv00701
Defendant:
W CLEMMONS, ALFORD, B PINEDAS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Eaton et al
as 3:2021cv00169
Defendant:
T Stenftangle, D. Phillips, T Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. EATON et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
D PHILLIPS, T STENFTANGLE, L YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00272
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05965
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
