Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rose v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00491
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Rose
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and US Bancorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Daigle v. Rose et al
as 4:2017cv02196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mark Daigle
Defendant:
D. Rose, Wayne L. Moss, Keith H Thedford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. U. S. Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00902
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Rose
Defendant:
U. S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rose v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association
as 1:2014cv00033
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Rose, M.D., PH.D. et al v. Mata
as 5:2013mc00556
Defendant:
Michael Enriquez
Respondent:
Andrea Mata
Movant:
Jonathan D. Rose, M.D., PH.D.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Rose, M.D., PH.D.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Rose, M.D., PH.D. v. Enriquez et al
as 5:2013mc00436
Defendant:
Does 1 -10, Jesus Enriquez, Michael Enriquez and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Rose, M.D., PH.D.
Rose v. Enriquez et al
as 5:2013mc00396
Defendant:
Michael Enriquez
Respondent:
Andrea Mata
Movant:
Jonathan D. Rose, M.D., PH.D.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Rose, M.D., PH.D.
Barkwell v. Martinez et al
as 6:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Barkwell
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Bristow, Aurelia Martinez, Lt. FNU Naftzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barkwell v. Rose
as 6:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Barkwell
Defendant:
Virginia D. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. Rose et al
as 4:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Rose, Stacy M. Rose, John E. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
