Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Yassin Aref, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen, et al
as 20-5368
Defendant / Appellee:
Leslie Smith, Chief, Counter Terrorism Unit, Federal Bureau of Prisons, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref and Daniel McGowan
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kifah Jayyousi
Mohammad Amawi v. J. Walton, et al
as 19-1014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD Z. AMAWI
Defendant / Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIIN, Former Director of the BOP, BRIAN K. DAVIS, Current Assistant Director of the Correctional Programs Division of BOP, LESLIE SMITH, Current Chief of the Countererrorism Unit. and others
Monzer Al Kassar v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Monzer Al Kassar
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., D. Scott Dodrill and United States of America
Yassin Aref, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref, Kifah Jayyousi and Daniel McGowan
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisoners, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
AL KASSAR v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Ionescu v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv03064
Plaintiff:
Stefan Ionescu
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric H. Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Arnold Reeve
as 09-3408
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Respondent:
HARLEY LAPIN, Director of B.O.P., D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, J. GRONDOLSKY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B KUGLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
