Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Quick, C. Jourdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Ross
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Kate Brown, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpole v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jackson Harpole
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Collette Peters, Erin Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Gurule v. Jeri Taylor, et al
as 18-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee:
JERI TAYLOR, D. WETTLAUFER, D. LOZIER and others
Gurule v. Taylor et al
as 2:2015cv02260
Defendant:
L. Beamer, J. Dafoe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Charlton v. Oregon Department of Correctio, et al
as 14-35450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY SHANE CHARLTON
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, LYTLE, Dr., Doctor at TRCI, D. MILLS, Super at TRCI and others
McLennan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00755
Defendant:
Registered Nurse Astorga, Doctor Leland Beamer, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle McLennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Charlton v. Oregon Department of Correctio, et al
as 11-35147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY SHANE CHARLTON
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, LYTLE, Dr., Doctor at TRCI, D. MILLS, Super at TRCI and others
Charlton v. Oregon Department of Correction et al
as 6:2009cv01246
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Correction, Dr. Lytle, D. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
