Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Watkins v. Chitwood
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tracy D. Watkins
Defendant:
Scott Chitwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Frankish et al
as 1:2019cv00613
Defendant:
Unknown intake officers, Judge Drane, III, R-Pod Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Pickens County Courts et al
as 1:2019cv00582
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Defendant:
Magistrate: Presiding Judge(s)/District Atty Office, Superior: Presiding Judge(s)/District Atty Office, Clerk of Courts: Superior and Magistrate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Pickens County et al
as 2:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Defendant:
Magistrate: Presiding Judge(s)/District Atty Office, Superior: Presiding Judge(s)/District Atty Office, Clerk of Courts: Superior and Magistrate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Superior/State/Magistrate Cherokee County's Courts
as 1:2019cv00533
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Defendant:
Superior/State/Magistrate Cherokee County's Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Cherokee County Georgia Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Defendant:
Cherokee County Georgia Superior Court and Patty Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Cherokee County Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
Randall D. Watkins
Defendant:
District Attorney Office of Both Courts, Cherokee County Magistrate Court, Cherokee County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Owens et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Timothy Ward, Rick Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Capital City Bank
as 3:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Samantha D. Watkins
Defendant:
Capital City Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
