Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Ms J Rodriguez, Mr R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv04252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, Warden R. Bowers, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02494
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, D Wonders, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
R Moore, Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01055
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, D Blackshire, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
NFN Simmons, NFN Ward, D Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, D Wonders, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01161
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
B. Lumpkin, R. Mooll, R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, D. Wonders, FNU Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
